lolKyle Judkins wrote: ↑Tue 6 Apr 2021 02:28 I guess my experience is an illusion because CNN didn't cover it -
Search found 106 matches
- Fri 9 Apr 2021 21:57
- Forum: VI Control-Banned For Blasphemy
- Topic: PART 10 - TWO YEARS LATER...
- Replies: 53
- Views: 182666
Re: PART 10 - TWO YEARS LATER...
- Mon 5 Apr 2021 08:35
- Forum: VI Control-Banned For Blasphemy
- Topic: PART 10 - TWO YEARS LATER...
- Replies: 53
- Views: 182666
Re: PART 10 - TWO YEARS LATER...
I can't help thinking Toecutter is Phil_l : Toecutter was here from the beginning as Phil_l. Toecutter was very involved emotionally and very pissed off by the truths I've exposed, as Phil_l was. Instead of blaming Hans for his blatant lies and VIC morons for their unfair insults, Toecutter blamed m...
- Sun 4 Apr 2021 20:41
- Forum: VI Control-Banned For Blasphemy
- Topic: PART 10 - TWO YEARS LATER...
- Replies: 53
- Views: 182666
Re: PART 10 - TWO YEARS LATER...
What really makes me wonder is how a person who is actually pretty critical himself could be such a hypocrite against others being critical. Here is the most crazy part : Toecutter concludes that JXL did not compose a particular cue from Scooby Doo given that another composer shared it on his perso...
- Sat 3 Apr 2021 19:41
- Forum: VI Control-Banned For Blasphemy
- Topic: PART 10 - TWO YEARS LATER...
- Replies: 53
- Views: 182666
Re: PART 10 - TWO YEARS LATER...
https://zupimages.net/up/21/13/uv7c.jpg https://zupimages.net/up/21/13/eqhw.jpg So, JXL writing skills are very limited and it's no secret he has a team of collaborators...and if a piece is well written, it was composed by someone else...hm... Why did he attack me for saying exactly the same things...
- Sat 6 Mar 2021 01:50
- Forum: VI Control-Banned For Blasphemy
- Topic: PART 10 - TWO YEARS LATER...
- Replies: 53
- Views: 182666
Re: PART 10 - TWO YEARS LATER...
lol
Sorry if I was wrong, but you have the exact same way of reasoning.
Sorry if I was wrong, but you have the exact same way of reasoning.
- Sat 27 Feb 2021 02:52
- Forum: VI Control-Banned For Blasphemy
- Topic: PART 10 - TWO YEARS LATER...
- Replies: 53
- Views: 182666
Re: PART 10 - TWO YEARS LATER...
Your initiation is done !Passmore610 wrote: ↑Sat 27 Feb 2021 01:23 "You have been banned for the following reason: I'm not going to engage in an argument about how I run the forum, so I'm giving you a few days off.."
- Sat 27 Feb 2021 00:15
- Forum: VI Control-Banned For Blasphemy
- Topic: PART 10 - TWO YEARS LATER...
- Replies: 53
- Views: 182666
Re: PART 10 - TWO YEARS LATER...
Yes, my comments are definitely supportive of you but primarily it's just basic common sense My first reaction was also based on pure common sense. This is what I'm trying to make you understand : common sense is not valued on VIC. If your common sense offends Hans/Spitfire/Mike, you are wrong. Fac...
- Fri 26 Feb 2021 21:23
- Forum: VI Control-Banned For Blasphemy
- Topic: PART 10 - TWO YEARS LATER...
- Replies: 53
- Views: 182666
- Fri 26 Feb 2021 21:14
- Forum: VI Control-Banned For Blasphemy
- Topic: PART 10 - TWO YEARS LATER...
- Replies: 53
- Views: 182666
Re: PART 10 - TWO YEARS LATER...
https://zupimages.net/up/21/08/x1r2.jpg https://zupimages.net/up/21/08/nh0d.jpg I'm not banned, but cannot believe my comment was deleted and edited! I'm actually a little bit angry about that, I very much appreciate your support, sincerely, but you're playing with fire : if you are a little irrita...
- Fri 26 Feb 2021 17:19
- Forum: VI Control-Banned For Blasphemy
- Topic: PART 10 - TWO YEARS LATER...
- Replies: 53
- Views: 182666
- Fri 26 Feb 2021 00:21
- Forum: VI Control-Banned For Blasphemy
- Topic: PART 10 - TWO YEARS LATER...
- Replies: 53
- Views: 182666
Re: PART 10 - TWO YEARS LATER...
And lo and behold the comment has been deleted haha. Can't quite believe it lol I've read your deleted posts, thanks for your support. This drama, among others, has shown that it is impossible to have a rational discussion on VIC. Trying to make a point about that matter using rational thinking wit...
- Fri 1 Jan 2021 19:39
- Forum: VI Control-Banned For Blasphemy
- Topic: PART 10 - TWO YEARS LATER...
- Replies: 53
- Views: 182666
Re: PART 10 - TWO YEARS LATER...
He protects his business, I can't blame it for that...But letting Toecutter pour out his hatred and blatantly lie is much more questionable...It's nothing more than revenge, and not a really fair one. Instead of moderating Toecutter who got angry unjustifiably in an inappropriate time and place, tri...
- Fri 1 Jan 2021 17:10
- Forum: VI Control-Banned For Blasphemy
- Topic: PART 10 - TWO YEARS LATER...
- Replies: 53
- Views: 182666
PART 10 - TWO YEARS LATER...
I never thought I'd start this year with this, but let's say the circle is now complete. After huge spam attacks during November and December in this particular section I thought that I would certainly leave it offline. But given that a guy brought this drama out in a very biased way, I have no choi...
- Thu 15 Nov 2018 22:53
- Forum: VI Control-Banned For Blasphemy
- Topic: PART 07 - "I Will Dig Up The Demo" - Must See ! (6 PARTS)
- Replies: 45
- Views: 118302
Re: PART 10 - "I Will Dig Up The Demo" - Must See ! (6 PARTS)
My pleasure.
lol
Certainly the most severe case of zimmermania I've ever seen.
- Thu 15 Nov 2018 13:30
- Forum: VI Control-Banned For Blasphemy
- Topic: PART 07 - "I Will Dig Up The Demo" - Must See ! (6 PARTS)
- Replies: 45
- Views: 118302
Re: PART 10 - "I Will Dig Up The Demo" - Must See ! (6 PARTS)
Wow, I'm both amazed by the amount of energy you deployed What really activated my "berserker mode" was not Hans's bullshit, but the way his stupid ass-kissers defended him. The only way to show them how pathetic they were was to expose the truth, which required a considerable amount of t...